Legal Opinion

St. Francis Drainage District v. Austin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1956No. 5-1082PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

This is a suit by appellees for damages to crops caused by the appellant, St. Francis Drainage District, using poison known as 2,4-D to kill willows growing on the drainage ditch right-of-way. Some of the poison drifted through the air and came in contact with some of the crops being grown by the appellees on land adjoining the drainage ditch. The cause was tried to a jury and there were verdicts total-ling about $15,000 for appellees. The Drainage District has appealed.

The cause was submitted to the jury on the theory of whether the farmers, appellees, were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wood v. Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. McLaughlin v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Campbell v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Jones v. Sewer Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Hot Springs R. R. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. AGCS Marine Ins. Co. v. Arlington Cnty.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  2. Dallas County Flood Control District v. BensonTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. LasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Collins v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Ark. State Highway Commn. v. SteedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API