Legal Opinion
In Re Gil
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1995No. 94-BG-526PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent be disbarred for engaging in criminal conduct and “extremely serious acts of dishonesty.” A Hearing Committee and the Board both concluded that respondent engaged in conduct which amounted to theft, as well as other dishonest acts, and thereby violated Rule 8.4(b) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the honesty, trust-worthiness or fitness of a lawyer) and Rule 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BaishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Matter of LieberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Skeeter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re KanuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.