Legal Opinion
In Re Kanu
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2010No. 08-BG-1401PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OBERLY, Associate Judge:
This disciplinary case is before us on exceptions by respondent Anita C. Kanu, a member of the District of Columbia Bar, and by Bar Counsel to the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility. The Board recommended that we find that Kanu violated District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct 1.16(d) (failure to refund unearned fees), 7.1 (false or misleading statements about her services) and 8.4(c) (conduct involving fraud, dishonesty, deceit or misrepresentation), arising out of Kanu’s failure to refund fees she had promised to return to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In re HowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Gilbert BaberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In Re DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re AskewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.