Legal Opinion

Kirkorowicz v. California Coastal Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 2000No. D034287PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

The California Coastal Commission (Commission) appeals a judgment issuing a peremptory writ of administrative mandamus directing it to set aside its decision denying brothers Christopher and Gregory Kirkorowicz a coastal development permit (CDP) to expand horse stables and boarding facilities on their Encinitas property and to rehear the matter to determine whether the property includes protected wetlands. Challenging the trial court’s determination that the record lacks substantial evidence to support a finding the property does contain a jurisdictional wetland, the Commission…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. William B. Ellen, United States of America v. William B. EllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Saad v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Sierra Club v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Bolsa Chica Land Trust v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. City of San Diego v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Dunn v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Ross v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Young v. City of CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Ass'n v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API