Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 1993No. A053941PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, J.
The Sierra Club petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) against a decision of the California Coastal Commission (Commission) approving and certifying a land-use plan (LUP) of real party in interest, the County of Mendocino (County), as consistent with the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Coastal Act or Act) (Pub. Resources Code, § 30000 et seq.). 1 The Commission and County appeal from the court’s issuance of a peremptory writ commanding the Commission to set aside its approval for failure to confer environmentally sensitive habitat area…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- San Mateo County Coastal Landowners' Ass'n v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Sinclair Oil Corp. v. County of Santa BarbaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Dunn v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.