State v. Storholm
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant Paul Richard Storholm appeals from his conviction for aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and aggravated driving with an alcohol concentration of .08 or more. Defendant asserts that due process requires law enforcement to provide DUI suspects their own breath samples for independent testing. He argues that because he did not receive a sample, we should reverse his conviction and exclude breath test evidence on retrial.
¶ 2 Phoenix Police Officer Thomas Tieman stopped Defendant for driving without his headlights and following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. Gonzalez-GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Smith v. CadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Guthrie v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Moss v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Arizona v. CoopermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015