State v. Adair
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THUMMA, Judge:
¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals from an order granting Christian Adair’s motion to suppress the fruits of a probation officer’s warrantless search of his residence. The State argues the warrantless search did not violate Adair’s Fourth Amendment rights because it was reasonable under the totality of the circumstances. Because reasonableness under the totality of the circumstances satisfies the requirements of the Fourth Amendment for such a search, the order is vacated and this matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTS 1 AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Christian AdairArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. LietzauCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019