State of Arizona v. Cooperman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In Guthrie v. Jones, 202 Ariz. 273, ¶ 2, 43 P.3d 601, 602 (App.2002), this court held that evidence regarding breath-to-blood partition ratios 1 is inadmissible in a prosecution for di’iving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle with an alcohol concentration of .08 or more within two hours of driving, in violation of A.R.S. § 28-1381(A)(2). However, we also held that when the state uses breath-test results to establish a presumption of intoxication in a prosecution for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) while impaired to the slightest…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. VangelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Cv-12-0319-Pr State of Arizona v. Joseph CoopermanArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Jay Alton RoachIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Bhajanpal ChopraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016