Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Cooperman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 14, 2012No. 2 CA-CV 2011-0197PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In Guthrie v. Jones, 202 Ariz. 273, ¶ 2, 43 P.3d 601, 602 (App.2002), this court held that evidence regarding breath-to-blood partition ratios 1 is inadmissible in a prosecution for di’iving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle with an alcohol concentration of .08 or more within two hours of driving, in violation of A.R.S. § 28-1381(A)(2). However, we also held that when the state uses breath-test results to establish a presumption of intoxication in a prosecution for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) while impaired to the slightest…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. VangelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cv-12-0319-Pr State of Arizona v. Joseph CoopermanArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. Jay Alton RoachIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Bhajanpal ChopraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API