Legal Opinion

Bolack v. Chevron, U.S.A. Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1998No. 97-58PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Chevron, U.S.A. Inc. (Chevron) filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming seeking payment from non-operating interest owners, Thomas Morgan (Morgan) and Tom Bolack (Bolack), under a Unit Operating Agreement. The amounts for which Chevron claimed arose from payments Chevron tendered in the settlement of four personal injury suits. Bolack and Morgan refused to pay, claiming that Chevron’s demand was barred by Wyoming’s anti-indemnity statute, Wyo. Stat. § 30-1-131 (1997). Pursuant to Wyo. Stat. §§ 1 — 13— 104 through 1-13-107 (1997) and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Davis v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. EmersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gainsco Insurance Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Merkison v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cannon Oil v. KLX EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  5. Bryant v. State ex rel. Wyoming Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API