Ryan v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KALOKATHIS, District Judge.
Convicted of murdering his wife, Appellant alleges numerous errors deprived him of his right to a fair trial. While we find that Appellant was impermissibly profiled by expert testimony, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. As none of Appellant’s other contentions are meritorious, we affirm.
I.ISSUES
Appellant, Roy Dale Ryan (Ryan), presents eight issues for our review:
I. Did the trial court deprive Appellant of his constitutional right to a fair trial when it told the prospective jurors that appellant was there because he murdered his wife?
II. Did the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Thomas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.