Legal Opinion

Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Emerson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1978No. 4838PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment arising from a declaratory-judgment action having to do with the rights of Mountain Fuel Supply Company (Mountain Fuel) to indemnification from Charles Emerson, d. b. a. Emerson Well Service (Emerson). Emerson initiated the action, seeking a declaration that an indemnity provision of an agreement between the parties was void and unenforceable under § 30-28.3, et seq., W.S.1957, C.1967, 1975 Cum.Supp. 1 Mountain Fuel counterclaimed, asserting the provisions’ validity and demanding that Emerson defend Mountain Fuel in a wrongful-death…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Davis v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Getty Oil Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mentock v. MentockWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Meyer v. KendigWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. G.C. Zarnas & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API