Legal Opinion

Bryant v. State ex rel. Wyoming Department of Transportation

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2002No. 01-146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[T1] Appellant Roland Chester Bryant appeals from the district court's affirmance of the Office of Administrative Hearing (OAH) order, which sustained the implied consent suspension of his driver's license as well as the disqualification of his commercial driver's license.

[12] We affirm.

ISSUES

[13] Bryant offers the following issues for our consideration:

1. Did the Hearing Examiner err when she indicated that the arresting officer did not need to have proof that he was certified to operate an approved chemical test pursuant to Wyoming Statute § 81-6-*7105(a), because the Licensee…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. BruhnWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olivas v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LegardaWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kruzich v. Martin-Harris Gallery, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bryant v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. RivasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API