Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Krupansky
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1980No. 80-3146PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed by the City of Cleveland (City) against Honorable Robert B. Krupansky, United States District Judge for Northern Ohio, Eastern Division (Judge), and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI), which relates to a complex antitrust action pending before the Judge since July 1,1975, and known as City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Civil Action No. C75-560 and seeks an order from this court requiring the Judge “to cease his unlawful abuse of judicial power and to permit the City discovery in accordance with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michelle Oliver v. Michigan State Board of Education, and Kalamazooboard of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
- Kyle Engineering Co. v. KleppeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Chemical and Industrial Corp. v. DruffelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re the Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Petition for Mandamus by Everett MechemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Metadure Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Phillips-Deloatch ex rel. Estate of Roberts v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.