Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1984No. 82-3053PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.
The City of Cleveland appeals a jury verdict for Cleveland Electric Illuminating (“Cleveland Electric”) in this antitrust case. On July 1, 1975, the City sued Cleveland Electric and several other utilities, alleging that they combined to restrain trade, to monopolize and attempt to monopolize the electric power market in Cleveland and surrounding service areas in violation of sections one and two of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. After the other defendants settled out of the case, the City amended its complaint to charge Cleveland Electric with a section two…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jordan Mark Sutkiewicz v. Monroe County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Potters Medical Center v. City Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Potters Medical Center v. The City Hospital AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Arthur S. Langenderfer, Inc. v. S.E. Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Michigan Division-Monument Builders of North America v. Michigan Cemetery Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.