Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 12, 1977No. Civ. A. C75-560PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KRUPANSKY, District Judge.
This is an action instituted by the plaintiff City of Cleveland (City) against defendants Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI), Duquesne Light Company, Ohio Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power Company, and Toledo Edison Company charging a conspiracy to violate Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2. Jurisdiction is properly invoked pursuant to Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26.
The Complaint, alleging certain acts of conspiracy to monopolize and restrain trade, was filed on July 1,1975.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- CenTra, Inc. v. EstrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- International Business Machines Corp. v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Manning v. Waring, Cox, James, Sklar & AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.