Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Martin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1943PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $689.56 alleged to be the balance due for feed and pasturage furnished by plaintiff to defendant’s cattle under a written agreement and an oral modification thereof.

The trial was to the court without a jury, and findings and judgments were entered in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

One of the assignments of error is based upon the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings, but, as no bill of exceptions has been brought to this court, that question is not before us. There is a transcript of testimony certified to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. British Queen Mining Co. v. Baker Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Bassett v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Searcy County v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hunter v. MilhousIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Briscoe v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Matter of Estate of HurlbuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Hawkins v. Teeples and Thatcher, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Miller Lumber Corp. v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API