Thompson-McLean, Inc. v. Campbell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
“It is established law in this jurisdiction that a real estate broker is not entitled to commissions or compensation unless he has found a prospect, ready, able and willing to purchase in accordance with conditions imposed in the broker’s contract.” Sparks v. Purser, 258 N.C. 55, 127 S.E. 2d 765. Therefore, for a broker to recover he must establish (1) a binding contract and (2) performance on his part. The plaintiff bases this action upon the agreement which the parties made on October 18, 1961. That agreement was not entirely in writing. The portion which related to the mode of paying the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Goeckel v. StokelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Carver v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- White v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Resort Realty of the Outer Banks, Inc. v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Renfro v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Young v. SweetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Property Shop, Inc. v. Mountain City Investment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Aiken v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.