Property Shop, Inc. v. Mountain City Investment Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
Defendant first argues that the court erred in excluding portions of Bhagu Patel’s testimony. Patel was allowed to testify that he learned of the Downtowner in a conversation with his cousin, Sombahai Patel, who lived in High Point. The court excluded Patel’s testimony that his cousin said the property was nice and the reasons his cousin did not want to buy the property himself. We do not believe that the excluded statements were material or that excluding the testimony was prejudicial to defendant. Hege v. Sellers, 241 N.C. 240, 84 S.E. 2d 892 (1954). We find no merit to this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hege v. SellersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Faeber v. ECT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Lindsey v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Baker v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alston v. MonkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Scheerer v. FisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Hinnant v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- National Service Industries, Inc. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Lambe-Young, Inc. v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.