United China & Glass Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LANDIS, Judge:
Plaintiff in this protest has abandoned all claims save the claim that merchandise, imported from Hong Kong, described in the entry invoice as “Glass Water Balls”, assessed at 50 per centum ad valorem, under TSUS item 546.51, is properly dutiable at 28 per centum ad valorem, under TSUS item 748.20. Those competing tariff item classifications provide as follows:
Tariff Schedules of the United States (hereinafter TSUS), schedule 5, part 3:
Subpart C. — Glassware and Other Glass Products
Articles chiefly used in the household or elsewhere for preparing, serving, or storing food or…
2Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Better Home Plastics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Oak Laminates Division of Oak Materials Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.