Legal Opinion
Dantley v. Howard University
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 2002No. 00-CV-1672PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge.
On June 26, 2000, the Superior Court entered summary judgment on appellant Paulette Dantley’s breach of contract claim against Howard University. On appeal, she argues that summary judgment in favor of Howard was inappropriate as a matter of law, because her contract with Howard University was broken when she was terminated pursuant to a reduction-in-force. Determining that summary judgment was inappropriate in this case, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
From 1988 to 1994, Ms.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Jeroyd W. Greene v. Howard University, a Corporation, Nathan Hare v. Howard University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Strass v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-AtlanticDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Byrd v. Allstate Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Futrell v. Department of Labor Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Estenos v. PAHO/WHO Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Howard University v. LacyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Reaves-Bey v. KarrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Mawakana v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.