Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Allstate Insurance Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 1993No. 92-CV-320PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Appellant Percy Byrd appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 56(c). In his complaint, appellant sought recovery from Allstate, appellant’s insurer, claiming Allstate wrongfully refused to pay damages for injuries received by appellant while driving his employer’s automobile. The injuries were caused by the negligence of Curtis Brown, an uninsured motorist. Finding no genuine issue as to any material fact, we conclude that the trial court properly granted summary judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fowler v. A & A Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Aler v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
- Dodek v. Cf 16 Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ebert v. Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cameron v. USAA Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Redmond v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Chase v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.