Legal Opinion
Reaves-Bey v. Karr
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 2004No. 03-CV-67PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Kishma Reaves-Bey appeals from a grant of summary judgment for appellees on her claims for negligence and wrongful termination. 1 We conclude that Ms. Reaves-Bey’s claim for negligence was timely filed, but that she has not shown the existence of a genuine issue of material fact in dispute as to her wrongful termination claim. Therefore, we reverse the grant of summary judgment as to the negligence claim and affirm as to the wrongful termination claim.
I
Appellant was a messenger for appellee Zoom Courier Service. Part of Zoom’s operations involved the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ChinnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Carl v. Children's HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Duane S. Marusa v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Mullin v. Washington Free Weekly, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Saunders v. NematiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Winder v. ErsteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Hunter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.