Legal Opinion
In the Matter of: KSTP-TV v. Metro Transit, Below, Metropolitan Council, Relator.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 24, 2015No. A14-1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
Relator Metropolitan Council challenges an administrative-law judge’s order compelling production of video recordings of two incidents that occurred in 2013 on Metro Transit buses, contending that the administrative-law judge erroneously concluded that the video recordings are public data. Because we determine that the data in question are public and do not fall within the definition of “personnel data” under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes section 13.43, subdivision 1 (2014), we affirm.
FACTS
The facts of this case are undisputed.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Wiegel v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Demers v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- KSTP-TV v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Demers v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- KSTP-TV v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Robert Burks, Respondent/Cross-appellant v. Metropolitan Council, Appellant/Cross-respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- KSTP-TV v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016