Legal Opinion
Wiegel v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 2002No. C6-00-2050PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellants brought an action to compel respondents to disclose certain data in compliance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Data Practices Act). 1 The district court ordered that the city disclose the requested data and awarded attorney fees to appellants. However, the district court subsequently vacated the award of attorney fees when it became aware of a recently issued court of appeals opinion. Appellants then appealed the district court’s decision to vacate the award of attorney fees. The court of appeals affirmed the district court,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. AmbayeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Washington v. Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
3Cited by24 opinions
- Johnson v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Jason Shade, Individually v. City of Farmington, Minnesota, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation Ted Dau, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Gee v. Minnesota State Colleges & UniversitiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 292 v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- First National Bank of the North v. Automotive Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.