Robert Burks, Respondent/Cross-appellant v. Metropolitan Council, Appellant/Cross-respondent.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice,.
This case requires us to determine whether, under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (“Data Practices Act”), a Metro Transit passenger has the right to access a video recording in Metro Transit’s possession that depicts the passenger. See Minn.Stat. §§ 13.01-.90 (2014). The passenger in question, Robert Burks, requested access to the recording of an exchange he had with a Metro Transit bus driver.' After Metro Transit, a division of Metropolitan Council, denied Burks’s request, he filed a complaint in district court. The district court granted relief to Burks,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. HohenwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Wiegel v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- KSTP-TV v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In the Matter of: KSTP-TV v. Metro Transit, Below, Metropolitan Council, Relator.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
3Cited by2 opinions
- KSTP-TV v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017