Legal Opinion

Founders Insurance v. Munoz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2010No. 108605, 108612PublishedCited by 192 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fitzgerald

Justices Freeman, Thomas, Kilbride, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

In these consolidated appeals, we consider the validity of an automobile policy exclusion that precludes liability coverage when the person using the vehicle does not have a “reasonable belief” that he or she is “entitled” to do so. In each of the six underlying cases, the trial court ruled that the coverage exclusion was applicable to a driver who did not have a valid license. The appellate court, however, held that the coverage exclusion is ambiguous, and reversed the trial court’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hobbs v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the MidwestIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Valley Forge Insurance v. Swiderski Electronics, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gillen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by192 opinions

  1. Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of the Orland Fire Protection DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Mashallah, Inc v. West Bend Mutual Insurance ComCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Crescent Plaza Hotel Owner, L. v. Zurich American Insurance ComCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  4. Bradley Hotel Corp. v. Aspen Speciality Insurance ComCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  5. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2021

187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API