Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
Respondent Wanzek Construction, Inc. (Wanzek) was the general contractor for the construction of a municipal swimming pool. It incurred costs to replace coping stones that were manufactured by Aquatic Designs, Inc. (Aquatic). It brought this action against its insurer, appellant Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau), for indemnity under a comprehensive general liability insurance policy (CGL). Wausau moved for summary judgment under the business-risk doctrine, arguing that the risk that an insured’s product will not meet.contractual standards is a business risk that is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- United States Fire Insurance v. J.S.U.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2007
- General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- American Home Assurance Co. v. AGM Marine Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Pinnacle Group, Inc. v. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.