Legal Opinion

L T v Aerospace Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 15, 1970No. 342-68PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Judge.

This is a suit by a contractor to recover certain costs disallowed by the Government during the performance of a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee (CPFF) contract. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (hereinafter ASBCA or Board) denied the contractor’s claim and for the reasons given below, we concur in the result.

• The pertinent facts are as summarized: On July 17, 1961, defendant awarded the Chance Vought Corporation (CVC) CPFF contract number NOw 62-0078-c (later changed to NOw 62-0378-c and hereinafter referred to as the “Contract”) to reconfigure a Model F8U-1 aircraft into a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sundstrand Turbo, a Division of Sundstrand Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  2. Marquardt Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Richardson v. Virgin Islands Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1981
  4. ITT Gilfillan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Marquardt Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API