Legal Opinion

Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 17, 1969No. 364-67PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DURFEE, Judge.

Plaintiff contracted with the United States Air Force to design, develop and manufacture an electronic reconnaissance system to be carried in aircraft. The contract was a Fixed-Price-Incentive-Fee (FPIF) type, with a negotiated target cost of $22,389,523.00. A 10% target fee was added, making the target price $24,628,475.00. Cost savings below the target cost or expenditures above it were to be shared by the Air Force and plaintiff on an 80%-20% basis.

*1308General provision 52 of the contract…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  2. Sperry Flight Systems Division of Sperry Rand Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  3. First Enterprise v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Singer-General Precision, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API