Legal Opinion

Lawrenson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 12, 1957No. 369-56PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Judge

The plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of Charles S. Lawrenson, deceased, sues for annuity pay from January 1, 1952, to April 8,1956.

The primary issue turns on whether the deceased’s right to an annuity was governed by the amendment of 1948 to the Civil Service Betirement Act or whether, on the other hand, as plaintiff claims, he had a vested right to an immediate annuity as of the age of 55 years under the amendment to such act dated July 24, 1946. The pertinent provisions of the statute are set out as an appendix hereto.

For convenience the deceased will be referred to hereafter as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. MacLeod v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1938
  4. Rafferty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. Prentiss v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Daniel S. Urbina v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Leonard J. Ganse v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Arthur H. Nordstrom v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. McNeil v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Margaret E. Schellfeffer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API