Legal Opinion

Prentiss v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1953No. 103-52PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

In our decision of April 7,1953, we concluded that plain*522tiff was entitled to a Civil Service retirement annuity computed in accordance with the law as it existed at the time of his separation in 1946, since the more generous provisions of the Act of February 28,1948 (62 Stat. 53), were specifically denied persons in plaintiff’s category under the language of Section 8 of that Act. We then held that the law in effect when plaintiff was separated from the service in 1946 was the Act of May 29, 1930 (46 Stat. 468), as amended by the Act of January 24, 1942 (56 Stat. 13), and that under Section 5…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prentiss v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arthur H. Nordstrom v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Margaret E. Schellfeffer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Lawrenson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Bond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API