Prentiss v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge
In our decision of April 7,1953, we concluded that plain*522tiff was entitled to a Civil Service retirement annuity computed in accordance with the law as it existed at the time of his separation in 1946, since the more generous provisions of the Act of February 28,1948 (62 Stat. 53), were specifically denied persons in plaintiff’s category under the language of Section 8 of that Act. We then held that the law in effect when plaintiff was separated from the service in 1946 was the Act of May 29, 1930 (46 Stat. 468), as amended by the Act of January 24, 1942 (56 Stat. 13), and that under Section 5…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Prentiss v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arthur H. Nordstrom v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Margaret E. Schellfeffer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Lawrenson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Bond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957