Legal Opinion

CCL Service Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 10, 1999No. 98-664C, 98-692CPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This post-award bid protest is before the court on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, suggestion that the court dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiffs question whether the termination for convenience of the subject contracts and cancellation of the solicitation deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider the award of any further relief. They cross-moved for partial summai-y judgment, contending that the termination for convenience and failure to defend the award amounts to an admission of impropriety.

FACTS

On August 5, 1998,…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Three S Consulting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Square One Armoring Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Dellew Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API