Legal Opinion
CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 3, 2000No. 99-967CPublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Revised Opinion and Order
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
Defendant in this pre-award bid protest case,2 has moved to dismiss on the ground of mootness, because the challenged solicitation has been withdrawn. Although the parties have requested oral argument, the court deems it unnecessary.
BACKGROUND
The Department of the Navy (Navy) issued a request for proposals (RFP) on March 12, 1999, for a one-year contract, with six-month options extending the contract up to five years. The RFP solicited proposals for providing travel services to the Navy, in both the United States and various foreign locations. The…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.