Southern v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The appellants were convicted of driving while intoxicated. They were tried separately in municipal court in Fort Smith, and their cases were consolidated for appeal to the Sebastian County Circuit Court where their convictions were affirmed in non-jury proceedings. In their appeal in this court the appellants question, among other things, the constitutionality of parts of Act 549 of 1983, the Omnibus DWI Act, thus our jurisdiction arises from Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 29(1 )(c).
With respect to appellants Southern, Roden and Hager we must remand…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Sparrow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Redman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bunch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Girdner v. City of KensettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.