Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The appellant was found guilty of burglary of, and theft of property from, a warehouse. An accomplice testified that he and the appellant and another person committed the offenses. The appellant argues the accomplice’s testimony was not corroborated and the evidence was not sufficient to show the identity of the allegedly stolen property and value in excess of $200 which is required to support the appellant’s conviction of a class C felony on the theft charge. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41 -2203(2)(b)(i) (Supp. 1985).
Murie, the accomplice who testified, said the appellant had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Fretwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Linell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Redman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Guinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
- Wingfield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.