Legal Opinion
United States v. Keyspan Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 2, 2011No. 10 Civ. 1415(WHP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Plaintiff United States of America (the “United States” or “Government”) moves pursuant to § 2(b) of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (the “Tunney Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)-(h) for entry of a final judgment (the “Consent Decree”) settling its antitrust claims against Defendant Keyspan Corporation (“Keyspan”). This application presents a novel issue of law: whether the Department of Justice can seek disgorgement for a Sherman Act violation. This Court answers that question in the affirmative. For the following reasons, the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ball v. Soundview Composite Ltd. (In re Soundview Elite Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Sprint Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Simon v. KEYSPAN CORP.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. Apple, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. StanleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012