Legal Opinion
Olympic Refining Co. v. Carter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1964No. 19011PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
This proceeding was brought to vacate three protective orders entered in a Government antitrust suit, so that access could be gained to certain documents now withheld from public scrutiny. The district court entered an order denying the motion to vacate the protective orders, and this review was then instituted.
On February 28, 1958, Olympic Refining Company (Olympic) brought a treble-damage antitrust suit, referred to herein as the “Olympic case,” against Standard Oil Company of California (Standard), and General Petroleum Corporation (General), in the United States…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United Nuclear Corporation v. Cranford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Dr. Chester A. Wilk v. American Medical Association, the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. City of Burlington, VermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.