Legal Opinion

Huck v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1958PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

This appeal is concerned with a problem of construction of sec. 262.09 (4), Stats. So far as material here such statute reads as follows:

“If the defendant is a foreign corporation . . . and (a) is doing business in Wisconsin at the time of service, . . . service may be made ... by delivering . . . without the state a copy of the summons to any officer, director, or managing agent of the corporation.”

While Rock Island’s brief raises an issue as to whether its agent, upon whom service of process was made at Chicago, is a “managing agent,” counsel for such railroad stated in oral argument that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Wisconsin Allied Truck Owners Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Simonson v. International BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. State v. RosenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Wainscott v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hasley v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API