Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Rosen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1976No. 681 (1974)PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The issue in this case concerns the procedural requirements in forfeiture actions under ch. 161, Stats., the Uniform Controlled Substances Act.

Sec. 161.55, Stats., in pertinent part provides:

“ (1) The following are subj ect to forfeiture:
“(a) All controlled substances which have been manufactured, distributed, dispensed or acquired in violation of this chapter;
“(b) All raw materials, products and equipment of any kind which are used, or intended for use, in manu- factoring, compounding, processing, delivering, importing or exporting any controlled substance in violation of this chapter;
"...
“(d…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Worachek v. Stephenson Town School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. City of Appleton v. Outagamie CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Huck v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Arlene C. Wolf-Lillie v. Gerald M. Sonquist, Kenosha County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Village of Trempealeau v. MikrutWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Krimstock v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Krimstock v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API