Legal Opinion
Al-Ahmed v. Chertoff
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 14, 2008No. Civil Action 08-0678 (ESH)PublishedCited by 244 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed suit pursuant to the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702, to compel action on his 1-485 application for adjustment of immigration status, his 1-131 application for a travel document, and his 1-765 application for employment authorization. Defendants have moved to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant defendants’ motion.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Montgomery v. STG International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Sierra Club v. FlowersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- Aftab v. GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Bourdon v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Demery v. Montgomery County, Md.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Ravulapalli v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Chauhan v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.