Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. STG International, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1240 (RWR)PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Cheryl Montgomery and Gregory Bigelow bring age and race discrimination claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the District of Columbia’s Human Rights Act (“Human Rights Act”), and common law against their former employer, defendant STG International (“STG”). STG has moved to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, and has moved to sever the plaintiffs asserting that they are improperly joined. The plaintiffs oppose a transfer and severance. Because STG has shown that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Aftab v. GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Al-Ahmed v. ChertoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Aracely v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Demery v. Montgomery County, Md.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.