Legal Opinion
Chauhan v. Napolitano
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 25, 2010No. Civil Action 10-491 (EGS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife Dipesh V. Chauhan and Divya D. Chauhan bring claims against the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, the Attorney General of the United States, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), the Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), the Director of USCIS’ Dallas Field Office, and the Director of USCIS’ Atlanta District Office, alleging that they have unreasonably delayed processing plaintiffs’ applications for adjustment of their status. Pending…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- William Rodger Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGuire Arthur Everett Small, Jr. v. Honorable George L. Hart, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Al-Ahmed v. ChertoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Aishat v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hill v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- AMERICAN CENTER FOR CIVIL JUSTICE v. AmbushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Aishat v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Akinyode v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.