Legal Opinion

Shephard v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1939No. 27284. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This appeal grows out of a collision between a pedestrian and an automobile, which occurred in the city of Everett at or near the intersection of Pacific avenue and Norton street at about 1:30 a. m., July 4, 1937.

Being confronted with seventeen assignments of legal error, we shall not attempt to state the facts in detail. It is not a case of a pedestrian suddenly running out into the street. Shephard, the pedestrian, was crossing the street at or near the crosswalk, and was three-quarters of the way across when the collision happened. The streets were dry. There was no other traffic to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hillebrant v. ManzWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. State v. BirchWashington Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bartlett v. HantoverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  3. Robinson v. HreinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lindberg v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bunnell v. BarrWashington Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API