Legal Opinion

Hillebrant v. Manz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1912No. 10656PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered April 2, 1912, upon granting a non-suit, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained in a collision with an automobile.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries, suffered by the plaintiff by being struck by the defendant with his automobile.

The negligence charged was, that the defendant negligently ran his automobile at a rapid, dangerous, and unlawful rate of speed; that the automobile was without good and proper brakes, steering gear, and horn, and that the defend*251ant negligently and carelessly, without sounding any horn or giving any other alarm, ran his automobile upon the defendant, inflicting the injuries complained of. The accident occurred in the city of Seattle, upon Westlake avenue…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Baker v. . CloseNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Burvant v. WolfeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hunt v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API