Legal Opinion
In Re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Lit.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 12, 2007No. MDL 05-1717 JJF, Civil Action No. 05-485-JJFPublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Intel Corporation’s Motion To Dismiss The First Amended Consolidated Complaint (D.I. 217 in Civil Action No. 05-485 and D.I. 307 in MDL Docket No. 05-1717). 1 For the reasons discussed the Court will grant-in-part and deny-in-part Defendant’s Motion.
BACKGROUND
The background related to this action has been set forth by the Court in its previous decision (D.I.299) addressing the Motion To Dismiss Class Plaintiffs Foreign Conduct Claims filed by Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”). In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Burtch v. Opus, LLC (In re Opus East, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In Re Digital Music Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.