Legal Opinion
William R. Markle v. Joanne A. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 26, 2003No. 02-3128PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
DEBEVOISE, Senior District Court Judge.
Appellant, William R. Markle, appeals from an order of the District Court affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) holding that Markle is not disabled and entitled to Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) and granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment. We conclude that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred when he failed to find that Markle had a full scale IQ score of 70. We will reverse and remand, directing the ALJ to complete Step 8 of the evaluation process by developing the record and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- William MORALES, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Thomas Williams v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Pamela CLARK, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Essie L. Hodges v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Talavera v. Commr of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Hancock v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- BASZTO v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- Randall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.