Legal Opinion

Randall v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2009No. 08-30783PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Annette Randall appeals a judgment denying her application for supplemental security income benefits. We affirm.

I

A

We first describe the legal framework. 1 The Social Security Act (“SSA”), 42 U.S.C. ch. 7, entitles certain “disabled” individuals to supplemental security income benefits (“SSI benefits”). 42 U.S.C. § 1381a. Un der the statute, disabled individuals are those who are “unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Talavera v. Comm’r of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Olivia Kneeland v. Nancy Berryhill, Acting CmsnrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Acosta v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
  4. Karen Ash v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. Libby v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API