Legal Opinion
Hancock v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 5, 2012No. 11-1001PublishedCited by 1,476 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge FLOYD joined.
OPINION
TRAXLER, Chief Judge:
In 2004, Karen Sue Hancock filed an application for supplemental security income (“SSI”), alleging both physical and mental disability. After her claim was denied by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Hancock requested a hearing before the Administrative Law Court. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denied her claim, and the Appeals Council likewise denied her request for review. Having exhausted her administrative remedies,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Pamela D. Johnson v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- William HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Etc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Mary Ruth Smith v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,476 opinions
- Talavera v. Commr of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Jimmy Radford v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Jeffrey Pearson v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Margaret Shinaberry v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Shelley Cannon v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
1,471 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.