Legal Opinion
Lax v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 6, 2007No. 06-3173PublishedCited by 1,885 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Alonzo Lax (“Lax”) appeals the district court’s order affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Lax’s application for social security disability benefits (“SSD”) and supplemental security income benefits (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401(a)-(m) and 42 U.S.C. § 1381. Lax contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in determining that Lax’s impairment did not meet or medically equal Listing 12.05(B) for mental retardation. We conclude that in the absence of a valid IQ score of 59 or less,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Grogan v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Hackett v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Hamlin v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,885 opinions
- Hancock v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Wilson v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Oldham v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Allman v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
1,880 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.