Legal Opinion

Essie L. Hodges v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 21, 2001No. 01-11387PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORENO, District Judge:

This is an appeal from a denial of social security benefits for mental retardation where the plaintiff did not present affirmative evidence of such disability before the age of twenty-two. The administrative law judge did not presume from the evidence of present mental deficiency that the claimant was mentally retarded before the age of twenty-two. We agree with other circuits in concluding that there is a presumption that mental retardation is a condition that remains constant throughout life. Therefore, we find that a claimant need not present evidence that she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John LOWERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, MD, Sec., Dept. of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Elmer D. Muncy v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Luckey v. U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Talavera v. Comm’r of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Patsy Copeland v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting CmsnrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. William R. Markle v. Joanne A. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Andre Williams v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Randall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API